Tessic Health

UT · STATE RULES

Telehealth rules in Utah

Utah treats a telehealth visit as one episode inside a patient's wider care, not a closed transaction. The telehealth act makes a remote provider push the record of the encounter to the patient's other treating clinician within two weeks, and two newer statutes decide what a brand's automated tools may say: a regulated occupation has to disclose generative AI up front, and a mental health chatbot is a licensed category with its own data and advertising limits. This page covers those rules, prescribing, licensing and how Tessic Health's providers work here.

Book a DemoAll states
First visit
Async with conditions
Physician license
IMLC; temporary endorsement
Controlled drugs
State license plus federal
Nurse practitioners
Full practice

Rules checked September 2026 · 26 sources cited

ONLY IN UTAH

What is different about Utah

Each rule here is true of Utah and of none of the states that border it. Beside each one: what the neighbours do instead.

  1. 01 · Practice

    Records go to the patient's own doctor

    Utah Code 26B-4-704 makes a telehealth provider give the patient's designated primary care or other treating provider a record of the encounter within two weeks, unless the patient objects. The duty runs to another clinician, not only to the patient.

    Source: Utah Code 26B-4-704

    Across the border

    • Idaho

      Idaho Code 54-5711 holds virtual care records to the same standard as an office chart and requires federal privacy compliance, but never asks the provider to send anything onward.

      Source: Idaho Code 54-5711

    • Wyoming

      Wyoming leaves records to the board's ordinary retention and release rules, so a remote visit generates a chart the patient can request rather than one that travels to another clinician by default.

      Source: Wyoming Board of Medicine

    • Colorado

      Colorado's telemedicine statement, required by C.R.S. 25.5-5-320, promises the patient continued access to their own medical records, and stops short of any transfer to a second provider.

      Source: Colorado Revised Statutes

    • New Mexico

      New Mexico requires a telemedicine encounter to be documented to the board's standard and released on request, with no clock running toward a transfer to the patient's usual clinician.

      Source: New Mexico Medical Board

    • Arizona

      Arizona's A.R.S. 36-3602 requires telehealth records to be kept and made available to the patient on request, which is a disclosure duty rather than an obligation to push notes anywhere.

      Source: A.R.S. 36-3602

    • Nevada

      Nevada puts its documentation weight on prescribing instead, asking under NRS 639.23911 for a written record of the risk assessment and the alternatives considered before a controlled substance.

      Source: NRS 639.23911

  2. 02 · Advertising

    A medical chat has to say it is a machine

    Under the artificial intelligence policy act as amended by SB 226, a supplier discloses that the consumer is dealing with generative artificial intelligence whenever asked, and at the start of a high-risk interaction: one that collects sensitive personal information or feeds a significant decision in a medical or mental health setting. A clinical intake is that kind of interaction.

    Source: Utah SB 226, artificial intelligence amendments

    Across the border

    • Idaho

      Idaho has passed no artificial intelligence statute, so a chat assistant there is limited only by the general prohibition on practicing a licensed profession without a license.

      Source: Idaho Code 54-1804

    • Wyoming

      Wyoming has no disclosure statute for automated tools either, leaving a brand's chat interface governed by its own representations and the general consumer protection act.

      Source: Wyoming Statutes

    • Colorado

      Colorado's artificial intelligence act is aimed at algorithmic discrimination in consequential decisions, loading duties onto developers and deployers rather than fixing what a consumer must be told as a session opens.

      Source: Colorado Revised Statutes

    • New Mexico

      New Mexico has enacted nothing on generative tools in professional services, so disclosure there is a matter of not misleading the patient rather than a specific statutory opening line.

      Source: New Mexico Statutes Annotated

    • Arizona

      Arizona's HB 2175 requires a licensed clinician to sign off on a medical necessity denial made with algorithmic help, which regulates the insurer's decision rather than the patient's conversation.

      Source: Arizona HB 2175 summary (Healthcare Value Hub)

    • Nevada

      Nevada answered the question by subtraction: AB 406 stops an artificial intelligence system providing behavioral or mental health care at all, so no disclosure formula was needed for it.

      Source: Nevada AB 406 summary (Wilson Sonsini)

  3. 03 · Practice

    Mental health chatbots have their own rulebook

    HB 452 reaches any system whose conversation a reasonable person would take for mental health therapy. Its supplier may not sell or share individually identifiable health information gathered from users, may not advertise inside the session unless the message is disclosed as an advertisement, and earns a defense only by keeping documented safeguard policies.

    Source: Utah HB 452, artificial intelligence amendments

    Across the border

    • Idaho

      Idaho regulates the clinician and not the tool. A conversational product there sits outside any statute until it crosses into treatment the virtual care act would recognize.

      Source: Idaho Code 54-5705

    • Wyoming

      Wyoming has drawn no line around conversational mental health products, so a supplier there answers to general advertising law and to the board only if a licensee is involved.

      Source: Wyoming Board of Medicine

    • Colorado

      Colorado's rules for high-risk systems turn on whether a consequential decision is being made, and a supportive conversation that recommends nothing is largely outside their reach.

      Source: Colorado Revised Statutes

    • New Mexico

      New Mexico has no chatbot statute, and the limits on such a product there come from the unlicensed practice provisions of the counselling and psychology practice acts.

      Source: New Mexico Statutes Annotated

    • Arizona

      Arizona has legislated on automated decisions in coverage but not on conversational care, so a mental health product there faces no data-sale ban or in-session advertising rule.

      Source: A.R.S. 36-3601

    • Nevada

      Nevada removed the category instead of licensing it, forbidding an artificial intelligence system from offering behavioral or mental health care and from claiming that it can.

      Source: Nevada AB 406 summary (Wilson Sonsini)

PRACTICE RULES

How telehealth works in Utah

The telehealth act in Utah Code 26B-4-704 sets the practice standard, and the Division of Professional Licensing enforces it through the individual practice acts. The state's newer technology statutes sit alongside it rather than inside it.

  1. 01

    The relationship forms in the encounter

    A provider must establish the provider and patient relationship during the patient encounter itself before treating. A history the patient supplied in advance supports the encounter but does not stand in for it.

    Source: Utah Code 26B-4-704

  2. 02

    Same scope, same standard

    The act holds a telehealth provider to the same standard of care, scope of practice and ethical duties that apply in person, and to the same record-keeping rules. The Medical Practice Act in Utah Code 58-67 supplies the discipline.

    Source: Utah Code 58-67-102

  3. 03

    Records move within two weeks

    Unless the patient objects, the provider sends a record of the telehealth encounter to the patient's designated primary care provider or other treating provider within two weeks. The objection, where it happens, belongs in the chart.

    Source: Utah Code 26B-4-704

  4. 04

    Consumer data has its own act

    The Utah Consumer Privacy Act in title 13 chapter 61 governs personal data held by larger businesses, with opt-out rights for targeted advertising and sale and consent required before processing sensitive data such as health information.

    Source: Utah Code 13-61-101

FIRST VISIT

Can a first visit happen without a live call in Utah?

Yes, with conditions

Yes, but the encounter has to do the work. Utah Code 26B-4-704 requires the relationship to form during the encounter and bars a prescription written on a questionnaire, an email or a patient-supplied history alone.

The test here is not the medium but whether the provider gathered clinical history, recorded current symptoms and reached a diagnosis. An intake that only collects answers and passes them to a prescriber does not clear it.

  1. 01

    History then diagnosis

    Before prescribing, the provider obtains relevant clinical history and documents current symptoms, and establishes a diagnosis from them. That sequence is what the act asks for, whatever technology carries the encounter.

    Source: Utah Code 26B-4-704

  2. 02

    A form is not an encounter

    Prescribing cannot rest solely on a questionnaire, an electronic mail exchange or a patient-generated history. Those may feed the encounter, but the act treats them as inputs rather than as the visit itself.

    Source: Utah Code 26B-4-704

  3. 03

    Asynchronous care is not a payment category

    State medical assistance rules do not cover asynchronous services, including store and forward imaging and remote monitoring, which pushes cash-pay and commercial telehealth toward encounters that are live or documented as thoroughly.

    Source: Center for Connected Health Policy: Utah

PRESCRIBING

Prescriptions and controlled drugs in Utah

Prescribing here takes two permissions rather than one. The state issues its own controlled substance license through the Division of Professional Licensing, and the controlled substance database has its own statutory chapter.

  1. 01

    A state license for controlled substances

    Utah Code 58-37-6 requires a practitioner who prescribes, dispenses or administers controlled substances to hold a state controlled substance license in addition to a federal registration. The two are applied for separately and renewed separately.

    Source: Utah Code 58-37-6

  2. 02

    The controlled substance database

    Utah Code 58-37f-203 governs the database that pharmacies report dispensing into and that prescribers and their authorized staff may query. Access is tied to the license, so the state license and the database go together.

    Source: Utah Code 58-37f-203

  3. 03

    No prescription without the encounter

    The bar on prescribing from a questionnaire alone applies to every drug, not only controlled ones, which makes the documented encounter the gate for a first weight, skin or hair prescription as much as for anything scheduled.

    Source: Utah Code 26B-4-704

  4. 04

    Out-of-state therapists cannot prescribe

    A mental health therapist practicing into the state from elsewhere may not prescribe unless separately licensed here, which keeps medication management with a locally licensed prescriber even where the therapy does not need one.

    Source: Center for Connected Health Policy: Utah

Federal rules apply on top of every state's. Prescribing controlled substances by telehealth without an in-person visit runs on DEA flexibilities currently extended through December 31, 2026, with a permanent rule still pending.

LICENSES

Who can treat patients in Utah

The Division of Professional Licensing licenses physicians, and the state belongs to the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact. A temporary license covers the gap while an endorsement application is pending.

  1. 01

    A temporary license while you apply

    Utah Code 58-1-302.1 authorizes a temporary license for a non-resident who has applied for licensure by endorsement, and it lets the holder deliver telemedicine to a patient located here while the application runs.

    Source: Utah Code 58-1-302.1

  2. 02

    The compact for the full license

    As a compact member the state accepts a letter of qualification from a physician's state of principal licensure and issues an expedited license of its own. The compact shortens the process rather than substituting for the license.

    Source: Interstate Medical Licensure Compact

  3. 03

    Nurse practitioners practice independently

    The American Association of Nurse Practitioners lists this state in the full practice column, so an advanced practice registered nurse assesses, diagnoses, orders tests and prescribes under the nursing board without a physician agreement.

    Source: AANP: full practice authority brief

  4. 04

    One division, many professions

    The Division of Professional Licensing administers the medical, nursing, pharmacy and mental health practice acts together, so a brand's clinicians, its prescribers and its therapists all renew under the same regulator.

    Source: Utah Division of Professional Licensing

How Tessic Health's providers are licensed in Utah

ADVERTISING

Marketing to patients in Utah

Marketing here is shaped by three statutes at once: the consumer sales practices act, the consumer privacy act's treatment of health data, and the disclosure duties that attach to generative tools in regulated work.

  1. 01

    Disclose the machine up front

    A high-risk interaction, which includes one that gathers sensitive personal information or supports a significant medical or mental health decision, opens with a disclosure that the consumer is dealing with generative artificial intelligence. Elsewhere the duty is triggered by the consumer asking.

    Source: Utah SB 226, artificial intelligence amendments

  2. 02

    No selling the conversation

    A mental health chatbot supplier may not sell or share individually identifiable health information gathered from users, which rules out feeding those transcripts into advertising audiences or third-party analytics.

    Source: Utah HB 452, artificial intelligence amendments

  3. 03

    Ads inside a session are labeled

    Where a product or service is put in front of a user during one of those conversations, the message has to be disclosed as an advertisement, so a recommendation cannot be dressed up as clinical advice.

    Source: Utah HB 452, artificial intelligence amendments

  4. 04

    Health data needs consent

    Under the Utah Consumer Privacy Act, health information counts as sensitive data and a controller must obtain consent before processing it, alongside the opt-out rights it grants for targeted advertising and sale.

    Source: Utah Code 13-61-101

  5. 05

    Subscriptions carry renewal duties

    The Automatic Renewal Contracts Act in title 13 chapter 70 applies to a plan that renews for a paid term longer than forty-five days, requiring the renewal terms to be disclosed clearly and conspicuously and enforced by the Division of Consumer Protection.

    Source: Utah Code 13-70-201

TESSIC HEALTH IN UTAH

How Tessic Health's providers cover Utah

A Utah patient signs up with the brand and is treated by Tessic Health's clinicians inside a clinician-owned practice the brand does not own. Each step below follows from a statute cited above.

  1. 01

    Two licenses for prescribers

    Prescribers treating patients here hold both the state controlled substance license and a federal registration before writing anything scheduled, and their database access is provisioned with the license.

  2. 02

    Record hand-off inside two weeks

    Where a patient names a primary care or other treating provider, a summary of the encounter is sent to that clinician inside two weeks, and a patient's objection is recorded in the chart rather than assumed.

  3. 03

    The encounter carries the prescription

    Intake gathers history and current symptoms and ends with a documented diagnosis made in the encounter, so no prescription rests on a questionnaire, an email thread or a history the patient typed in advance.

  4. 04

    Automated tools introduce themselves

    Any generative assistant a brand runs on its storefront opens by saying so, prominently, and hands off to a licensed clinician for anything that would amount to assessment or treatment.

  5. 05

    Session data stays out of marketing

    Conversation data from supportive or triage tools is never sold or shared for advertising, and in-session product mentions are labeled as advertisements where they appear at all.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Questions about telehealth in Utah

  • No. Utah Code 26B-4-704 requires the relationship to be established during the encounter and bars a prescription resting solely on a questionnaire, an email exchange or a patient-generated history. The encounter has to produce the diagnosis.

  • Yes. Unless the patient objects, the provider sends a record of the encounter to the patient's designated primary care or other treating provider within two weeks. It is one of the few states to require the hand-off.

  • Yes. Utah Code 58-37-6 requires a state controlled substance license on top of the federal registration, and access to the controlled substance database follows from it.

  • In a clinical intake, yes, and at the start. SB 226 requires the disclosure whenever a consumer asks, and up front in a high-risk interaction: one collecting sensitive personal information or supporting a significant medical or mental health decision.

  • Yes, inside limits. HB 452 covers any system a reasonable person would take for therapy: the supplier cannot sell or share individually identifiable health information from users, must disclose any advertisement placed in the session, and needs documented safeguard policies to rely on its defense.

  • Once an application is running, yes. Utah Code 58-1-302.1 provides a temporary license for a non-resident applying by endorsement, which covers telemedicine to patients here while the full application is processed.

SOURCES

Rules checked September 2026 · 26 sources cited. A planning summary, not legal advice. Statutes, board rules and enforcement priorities change; a brand's own counsel should review its model and marketing before launch.

OTHER STATES

Rules in other states

Each state page is researched from that state's own statutes and board rules.

All state pages →